<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kubrick&#8217;s Typeface</title>
	<link>http://wordlog.com/archives/2005/01/24/kubricks-typeface/</link>
	<description>WordPress news and updates from around the web.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 04:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Giovanni</title>
		<link>http://wordlog.com/archives/2005/01/24/kubricks-typeface/#comment-1018</link>
		<author>Giovanni</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wordlog.com/archives/2005/01/24/kubricks-typeface/#comment-1018</guid>
		<description>Trebuchet, while not too similar to Futura, is based on ideas of the same times.  It's available on most of the browser, it's "almost" screen readable, it's nice.

See "A List Apart" (alistapart.com) for an example of use.

I don't know if Kubrick would have loved it, and I'm not sure about mixing Trebuchet text with Futura display...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trebuchet, while not too similar to Futura, is based on ideas of the same times.  It&#8217;s available on most of the browser, it&#8217;s &#8220;almost&#8221; screen readable, it&#8217;s nice.</p>
<p>See &#8220;A List Apart&#8221; (alistapart.com) for an example of use.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if Kubrick would have loved it, and I&#8217;m not sure about mixing Trebuchet text with Futura display&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nico</title>
		<link>http://wordlog.com/archives/2005/01/24/kubricks-typeface/#comment-1017</link>
		<author>Nico</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2005 19:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wordlog.com/archives/2005/01/24/kubricks-typeface/#comment-1017</guid>
		<description>But Futura is no "screen readable" font (as Verdana, Lucida Grande or Bitstream Vera). If used for article text, it would be hard to read...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But Futura is no &#8220;screen readable&#8221; font (as Verdana, Lucida Grande or Bitstream Vera). If used for article text, it would be hard to read&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carthik</title>
		<link>http://wordlog.com/archives/2005/01/24/kubricks-typeface/#comment-1016</link>
		<author>Carthik</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2005 18:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wordlog.com/archives/2005/01/24/kubricks-typeface/#comment-1016</guid>
		<description>Thanks Giovanni, that's what I meant to write. I blame the gremlins :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Giovanni, that&#8217;s what I meant to write. I blame the gremlins <img src='http://wordlog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giovanni</title>
		<link>http://wordlog.com/archives/2005/01/24/kubricks-typeface/#comment-1014</link>
		<author>Giovanni</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wordlog.com/archives/2005/01/24/kubricks-typeface/#comment-1014</guid>
		<description>Futura, not Future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Futura, not Future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
