Comments on: Wicked Comments and WordPress

By: gebze nakliyat

gebze nakliyat — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:10:26 +0000

rss feed for the men comments onthis p?ost trezkbeckm

By: Brad

Brad — Sat, 18 Sep 2004 10:45:23 +0000

You really have to wonder at the incentive for all this spamming stuff. The motivation behind the spammers, yadda yadda…guess its a sign of desperation from them (spammers) *sigh*

By: Pete Prodoehl

Pete Prodoehl — Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:53:43 +0000

I’ve seen this used back around 1998 or so, it’s not a new one…

By: Sushubh

Sushubh — Sun, 12 Sep 2004 21:46:27 +0000

stupid spammers…

By: Albert

Albert — Sat, 11 Sep 2004 16:52:45 +0000

I tried to put the above meta header in the body of a document. All of Opera 7.54, IE6 and Firefox 0.93 for windows reloaded.

By: Ria

Ria — Fri, 10 Sep 2004 18:28:43 +0000

That’s the first time I’ve seen a meta used to spam. I’m glad that WP has been good to me regarding catching spam comments.

By: Neil T.

Neil T. — Fri, 10 Sep 2004 09:52:34 +0000

Most systems that allow HTML input from users will ignore meta tags, along with tags like object, embed, applet, iframe, script, and frameset to stop abuse. Still, never seen meta used before. If I get some free time I might put together a test case to see what browsers would actually process a meta tag in the body of a page.

By: Joen

Joen — Fri, 10 Sep 2004 07:29:42 +0000

Incredible the lenghts spammers will go to.

Glad it just works.

By: Charles on... anything that comes along » Spam me not, nor try to

Charles on... anything that comes along » Spam me not, nor try to — Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000

[...] s won’t allow superscript tags in comments, but its restrictions also have benefits. Here’s an example where a blog spammer tried to use an HTTP tag to ma [...]